Amazon's Algorithm Changes Leave Authors Guessing As New Ranking System Disrupts Traditional Launch Strategies
Amazon has once again thrown independent authors into uncertainty with changes to its bestseller ranking algorithm to update once per day rather than every hour, creating confusion among writers who have spent years mastering the platform's previous system. The retail giant's latest algorithmic adjustment appears designed to favor consistent long-term sales over the concentrated launch strategies that have defined successful book marketing for the past decade.
The changes have immediate implications for authors launching new titles, as demonstrated by Western author Robert Peecher's experience with his latest release, "My Brother's Keeper." Peecher, who has navigated multiple book launches under Amazon's previous system, provides valuable insight into how these modifications are affecting real authors in real time.
"Going through my first book launch under the new ranking system, I'm definitely seeing why it has people on edge, especially if they were accustomed to rank watching under the old system," Peecher explained. "After a day and a half, I've sold enough copies and have enough page reads that I would have expected to be ranked well inside the top 100 of the categories my book is in."
The results under the new system tell a different story. "As it is, I'm sitting just outside the top 100, which reduces visibility for a new book," Peecher noted, highlighting how the algorithm changes directly impact discoverability for fresh releases. This reduced visibility during the crucial launch window could significantly affect an author's ability to build momentum and reach new readers.
However, the algorithm changes aren't uniformly negative for all titles in an author's catalog. Peecher observed unexpected benefits for his backlist: "That said, some of my other books that had slipped out of the top 100 have popped back up with improved visibility. One of those books is more than 2 years old, so that's been a nice surprise."
This shift suggests Amazon is moving away from rewarding short-term sales spikes toward recognizing sustained performance over time. While this may frustrate authors who have perfected launch day strategies involving coordinated promotional campaigns, it could benefit writers with established catalogs of consistently selling books.
"This definitely changes tactics when it comes to book launches, but I think over the long term this is probably a change that will benefit most authors with a track record of steady sales over time," Peecher concluded.
Amazon has historically shown little concern for independent authors' welfare, often implementing policies that benefit Amazon's bottom line while creating additional challenges for self-published writers. From restrictive Kindle Unlimited terms to the controversial removal of hourly rank updates, Amazon's track record suggests these changes serve corporate interests first.
The new algorithm appears designed to reduce the effectiveness of promotional strategies that authors have developed to game the system, potentially forcing writers to rely more heavily on Amazon's paid advertising services. This would align with Amazon's traditional strategy of monetizing every aspect of the publishing process.
However, if Peecher's analysis proves correct, the changes might actually create a more sustainable ecosystem for authors with multiple titles and consistent sales histories. Rather than rewarding one-hit wonders or heavily promoted launches, the system could favor authors who consistently produce quality content that maintains steady readership over time.
The true impact of these algorithmic changes won't be clear for months, as authors adapt their strategies and Amazon continues tweaking the system. For now, writers like Peecher are documenting their experiences, providing valuable data points for the broader author community trying to understand how to succeed under Amazon's latest rules.
As always with Amazon's policy changes, independent authors find themselves forced to adapt to decisions made without their input or consideration, highlighting the precarious nature of building a business on someone else's platform.
Support an alternative to mainstream publishing. Sign up for the Jon Del Arroz newsletter and get THREE FREE BOOKS and stay up to date on deals and new releases from an author doing the good work.
Well, it might not be a popular opinion, but it sounds like a good thing.
Although Zon is under a tidal wave deluge of new authors and fake books, the strategies for overcoming the launch being buried are just as fake. Coordinating a belly-flop splash with a manufactured sales push and ARCs to get a boost of exposure is about as fake as AI to me.
On the other end of the spectrum, Zon has removed the ability to provide email addresses in the author's bio. If an author has one in there, don't edit your bio!
Authors need to engage readers via a different method than "visibility" and should rather more communicate with followers. Tougher to generate, but cleaner.
Could the system be better? Oh, without a doubt.
Repeat after me: Amazon is evil