YouTuber Mary Morgan of Pop Culture Crisis has delivered a devastating critique of the modern "romantasy" genre, exposing how what was once legitimate romantic fantasy has transformed into explicit pornographic content that's rewiring women's brains and destroying their ability to form healthy relationships.
The Church culture used to keep Evil at bay. The stuck up old lady with a clipboard used to be a warrior for the Light, in entertainment. Now mocked and thrown out, thusly, we have sexual gratuitous exploitation targeted at youth and no one from the Church to stop it.
This is exactly why I find it ironic that the people who sound the alarm the hardest for "gooner content" like titillating content with attractive women that seethe over Stellar Blade or various gacha games will be absolute coom brains that actively seek out incredibly degenerate novels, fanfics, fan art, OF and join pornographic chat rooms. (that's not even getting into the CP side of things) This isn't about moral outrage and more about curating content they don't like to funnel people into way more egregious and repulsive materials.
Walking around a local bookstore while on vacation, I heard the owner woman talk about being in a "smut rut" and listening to romantasy e-books because they are "easier to follow" while driving.
Purported harms committed by porn are, for most people, vastly overrated (assuming that it doesn't glorify rape or domestic violence). Its no surprise that anti-porn women frequent these kind of books, given the double standards that women now enjoy due to our femi-nihilist culture.
porn not only has destroyed you, it's a spiritual weapon.
pornography turns men into violent savages and breaks down the men so badly that they cannot have wives and therefore brings society to "revolution."
marquis de sade relied on "fathers" like you to push the french terror. basically marquis de sade put porn in the hands of as many young men as he could find, under the assumption that these men could no longer even look at their daughters or protect them for fear of being reminded of how they exploited women in their youths.
marquis de sade was right, and worse was the unintended consequence that childhood porn use made adult men violent. this is vastly studied and universally confirmed that porn makes men violent and without morals.
the marquis de sade said sexual sin makes man a shareholder in satanism no matter the affiliation. that's you.
there's a reason he used porn and public displays of sodomy and violence by his "gay scientists" (if you ever wondered why moderns call sodomites "gay") to force the helpless, sinful lemmings of france into their terror.
As Dr John C Rao said on this topic:
"It is precisely because this venomous attempt to build a civilization upon a freedom from efforts to fight Original Sin and its willful effects upon individuals is so tempting that it has infected almost all of us in some way or another. We almost all fall prey to the enticement simply to pick what “liberty” most appeals to our particular passion, declare it pleasing to God, willfully condemn whichever application of the same principle we find personally unacceptable when used by others, and ignore the innately poisonous nature of the entire concept. And, quite frankly, we almost all fall prey to the cynical temptation to mobilize the “total depravity” argument anew when we chuckle over the naïve, utopian vision of opponents who want to use law and authority to help make people virtuous in realms where we want “liberty”. But blithely making common cause with “liberty” in a world that did not have to be totally depraved but is making every effort to become so is riding on the back of a willful monster---with the current self-destructive appeal to religious liberty at the top of the list. It is only the positive liberty to use our Faith, Grace, our Reason, and the help of social authorities, both supernatural and natural, to correct and transform ourselves under the Social Kingship of Christ that can lead to a life worth living in this world and to eternal happiness in the next."
Or as many people have said for hundreds of years, with the most recent variation being something along the lines of:
"everyone is a libertarian for their own vices."
Or how about from God Himself to St Catherine of Siena:
"Do you know dearest daughter, how I raise the soul out of her imperfections? Sometimes I vex her with evil thoughts and a sterile mind. It will seem to her that I have left her completely, without any feeling whatever. She does not seem to be in the world, because she is in fact not there; nor does she seem to be in me because she has no feeling at all other than that her will does not want sin. I do not allow enemies to open the gate of the will that is free. I do let the devils and other enemies of humankind beat against other gates, but not against this, which is the main gate guarding the city of the soul. I do not will the soul’s death as long as she is not so stupid as to open the gate of her will. They cannot enter unless her own will chooses to let them in."
The Church culture used to keep Evil at bay. The stuck up old lady with a clipboard used to be a warrior for the Light, in entertainment. Now mocked and thrown out, thusly, we have sexual gratuitous exploitation targeted at youth and no one from the Church to stop it.
Carry on.
What do you mean with your last comment?
read my other comment here to "james."
This is exactly why I find it ironic that the people who sound the alarm the hardest for "gooner content" like titillating content with attractive women that seethe over Stellar Blade or various gacha games will be absolute coom brains that actively seek out incredibly degenerate novels, fanfics, fan art, OF and join pornographic chat rooms. (that's not even getting into the CP side of things) This isn't about moral outrage and more about curating content they don't like to funnel people into way more egregious and repulsive materials.
Walking around a local bookstore while on vacation, I heard the owner woman talk about being in a "smut rut" and listening to romantasy e-books because they are "easier to follow" while driving.
those are stnic nuns.
Purported harms committed by porn are, for most people, vastly overrated (assuming that it doesn't glorify rape or domestic violence). Its no surprise that anti-porn women frequent these kind of books, given the double standards that women now enjoy due to our femi-nihilist culture.
most undear, unforgivably damned coomer:
porn not only has destroyed you, it's a spiritual weapon.
pornography turns men into violent savages and breaks down the men so badly that they cannot have wives and therefore brings society to "revolution."
marquis de sade relied on "fathers" like you to push the french terror. basically marquis de sade put porn in the hands of as many young men as he could find, under the assumption that these men could no longer even look at their daughters or protect them for fear of being reminded of how they exploited women in their youths.
marquis de sade was right, and worse was the unintended consequence that childhood porn use made adult men violent. this is vastly studied and universally confirmed that porn makes men violent and without morals.
the marquis de sade said sexual sin makes man a shareholder in satanism no matter the affiliation. that's you.
there's a reason he used porn and public displays of sodomy and violence by his "gay scientists" (if you ever wondered why moderns call sodomites "gay") to force the helpless, sinful lemmings of france into their terror.
As Dr John C Rao said on this topic:
"It is precisely because this venomous attempt to build a civilization upon a freedom from efforts to fight Original Sin and its willful effects upon individuals is so tempting that it has infected almost all of us in some way or another. We almost all fall prey to the enticement simply to pick what “liberty” most appeals to our particular passion, declare it pleasing to God, willfully condemn whichever application of the same principle we find personally unacceptable when used by others, and ignore the innately poisonous nature of the entire concept. And, quite frankly, we almost all fall prey to the cynical temptation to mobilize the “total depravity” argument anew when we chuckle over the naïve, utopian vision of opponents who want to use law and authority to help make people virtuous in realms where we want “liberty”. But blithely making common cause with “liberty” in a world that did not have to be totally depraved but is making every effort to become so is riding on the back of a willful monster---with the current self-destructive appeal to religious liberty at the top of the list. It is only the positive liberty to use our Faith, Grace, our Reason, and the help of social authorities, both supernatural and natural, to correct and transform ourselves under the Social Kingship of Christ that can lead to a life worth living in this world and to eternal happiness in the next."
Or as many people have said for hundreds of years, with the most recent variation being something along the lines of:
"everyone is a libertarian for their own vices."
Or how about from God Himself to St Catherine of Siena:
"Do you know dearest daughter, how I raise the soul out of her imperfections? Sometimes I vex her with evil thoughts and a sterile mind. It will seem to her that I have left her completely, without any feeling whatever. She does not seem to be in the world, because she is in fact not there; nor does she seem to be in me because she has no feeling at all other than that her will does not want sin. I do not allow enemies to open the gate of the will that is free. I do let the devils and other enemies of humankind beat against other gates, but not against this, which is the main gate guarding the city of the soul. I do not will the soul’s death as long as she is not so stupid as to open the gate of her will. They cannot enter unless her own will chooses to let them in."
your curses are Consummately Returned!